|
|
|
|
EHR Frequently Asked Questions
-
Who is responsible for tracking patient encounters and calculating the
EP's patient volume?
-
Will the patient volume be validated and if so, by whom?
-
If claims are not used to determine patient encounters, how should they
be identified? Is there a report that can be run by an EHR?
-
Can Medicaid be the secondary insurer when determining total Medicaid patient encounters?
-
How will encounters be identified for a Nurse Practitioner that has services
billed under one or more physicians in the practice?
-
If a Nurse Practitioner (NP) works in a pediatrician's office and the pediatrician
only meets the 20% Medicaid patient volume, does the requirement for the NP to meet
the 30% patient volume still apply?
-
If a Nurse Practitioner (NP) works in a Family Practice office where the physician
patient volume threshold meets 30%, but the NP Medicaid patient volume is only 28% and bills
under the physician, does the NP qualify for an incentive even though she does not meet
the 30% patient volume?
-
I know at one point Behavior Health/Psychiatrist were excluded from being eligible
physicians for HITECH. Is this still the case or are psychiatrists eligible?
-
What is the first step in getting started? Is there a number I can call for more information?
-
I noticed on your website that EPs must verify they have paid at least ($3,750 for year 1
and $1,500 for year 2 through 6). If a Hospital or Home Office paid for the technology, is the EP still
eligible for incentive payments for EHR technology?
-
Is a PA in a FQHC eligible for incentives only if the PA is the patient's primary provider
or does the PA have to be the primary provider of the FQHC?
-
If a patient's primary provider is a physician but the patient is occasionally seen by
a PA, would the PA qualify for incentives?
-
Are PAs in physician offices, other than a FQHC qualified for incentives?
-
Is there any issue with EPs applying for Medicaid incentives and being associated with
the same TIN as the hospital that will also be applying for MU incentives?
-
We know that the billing provider NPI # is used to verify patient volume for EPs that
choose to use group encounters to meet eligibility requirements.
a) Does this mean the TIN has no bearing on eligibility requirements?
b) Will EPs use the billing provider NPI # for their main satellite office if they want to apply
using group encounters or will they use the billing provider NPI#s of all 4 locations together?
c) Several physicians practice at multiple locations. Will they use the billing provider NPI # of
all locations where they work to calculate group patient volume?
d) If a provider uses group volumes is the provider required to select the group as the payee?
-
If EP’s in a group have attested to program year 1 and a new EP joins the group, can
the new EP attest to AIU or will the EP be required to attest to MU?
-
As the non-EHR professionals adopt EHR technology (sharing the same TIN # as the EHR
early adopters), will their Medicaid patient volume percentages affect the group practice volume
percentages if the group practice qualifies as a group meeting the 30% Medicaid threshold?
-
One physician sees patients in a traveling van and all of his patients are considered
charity care. Will he be eligible for Medicaid incentives based on the needy individual’s definition:
patients furnished uncompensated care by the provider or services at no cost?
-
For the first participation year, an EP only has to Adopt, Implement, or Upgrade an
EHR to receive incentives. For the following years, the EP must meet certain objectives and measures
during a specified EHR reporting period. For participation year 2 and later, if a physician practices
at several locations, will all locations be taken into consideration to meet the objectives or will
only the primary practice location be utilized?
a. In order to demonstrate that at least 50% of all encounters occur in a location(s) where certified
EHR technology is being utilized, must a provider include all locations even if a single location
represents over 50% of the patient encounters?
-
For a FQHC, do free care encounters, charity care encounters, and sliding scale encounters
count toward meeting the 30% eligibility requirement?
- How is an encounter defined for purposes of determining patient volume?
- Where can Meaningful Use standards be found?
- What are the requirements for Stage 1 of Meaningful Use?
- What are the different Stages of the EHR Incentive Program?
- How long does a provider need to keep documentation supporting their EHR program application?
- For MU measure reporting in MAPIR will the percentages round up?
-
If an eligible professional (EP) sees a patient in a setting that does not have certified
electronic health record (EHR) technology but enters all of the patient's information into certified
EHR technology at another practice location, can the patient be counted in the numerators and denominators
of meaningful use measures for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs?
-
For eligible professionals (EPs) who see patients in both inpatient and outpatient settings
(e.g., hospital and clinic), and where certified electronic health record (EHR) technology is available
at each location, should these EPs base their denominators for meaningful use objectives on the number
of unique patients in only the outpatient setting or on the total number of unique patients from both settings?
-
How should eligible professionals (EPs) select menu objectives for the Medicare and Medicaid
Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Programs?
-
If I am participating in the Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program but
also provide care to Medicare patients, am I subject to the Medicare payment adjustments?
|
-
Who is responsible for tracking patient encounters and calculating
the EP's patient volume?
Providers are responsible for tracking patient encounters. Calculation of the patient volume for program
eligibility will be determined by the Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance (DMMA) based on the
encounter information entered by a provider through the DMAP incentive program web portal (MAPIR). Patient
volume must be broken out for each Medicaid managed care company and for fee for service Medicaid claims.
Providers that are working for more than one group and are claiming individual encounter volumes must
list encounters from all groups.
Return to top
-
Will the patient volume be validated and if so, by whom?
The Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance (DMMA) validates Medicaid encounters (numerator) through
claim data for the reporting period. If the Medicaid encounters related to an EP are submitted by an MCO,
and the EP’s NPI is not on the encounter, the PIP team will request validation of the encounters from the
MCO claims system. Providers will need to maintain adequate records that can validate the total patient
encounters (denominator) reported from all sources. DMMA will audit individual providers to ensure
program integrity. Additional information will be requested from providers to support the patient volume
provided for program eligibility. Incentive payments are paid with Federal Funds. Falsification or
concealment of a material fact may be prosecuted under Federal and State laws.
Return to top
-
If claims are not used to determine patient encounters, how should they be
identified? Is there a report that can be run by an EHR?
DMMA expects providers will use claim data, panel volume, or some type of reporting from an EHR or Practice
Management System to determine patient encounters. Total provider patient encounters could require data
from several different sources.
Return to top
-
Can Medicaid be the secondary insurer when determining total Medicaid patient encounters?
Effective in 2013, there are Stage 2 changes for Medicaid enrolled encounters: Numerator to
include service rendered on any one day to a Medicaid-enrolled individual, regardless of payment
liability. This includes zero-pay claims and encounters with patients in the Title XXI funded
Medicaid expansions, but not separate CHIP programs.
Return to top
-
How will encounters be identified for a Nurse Practitioner that has services billed
under one or more physicians in the practice?
The performing provider NPI will be used to verify patient volume for professionals that choose
to report their individual encounters to meet eligibility requirements of the incentive program.
The billing provider NPI will be used to verify patient volume for professionals that choose to
use the group encounters to meet eligibility requirements of the incentive program and that bill
under the group NPI. Regardless of performing provider NPI, the billing NPI will represent all
encounters for the group practice.
Return to top
-
If a Nurse Practitioner (NP) works in a pediatrician's office and the pediatrician
only meets the 20% Medicaid patient volume, does the requirement for the NP to meet the 30% patient
volume still apply?
Yes, the NP must meet the 30% patient volume. Medicaid patient volume required for program
eligibility must be consistent with the type of professional applying. In this scenario,
the NP needs to have a 30% Medicaid patient volume and the Pediatrician must have a 20%
patient volume, even if the professionals are using the group encounter volume to meet
program eligibility. The NP qualifies for the full incentive and the Pediatrician qualifies
for 2/3 of the incentive.
Return to top
-
If a Nurse Practitioner (NP) works in a Family Practice office where the
physician patient volume threshold meets 30%, but the NP Medicaid patient volume is
only 28% and bills under the physician, does the NP qualify for an incentive even though
she does not meet the 30% patient volume?
No, a NP must meet 30% Medicaid patient volume to be eligible for the incentive program.
(see 495.304 (c) (1) at 75 FR 44578). Billing provider information is only used when an
Individual uses the group patient volume to meet eligibility. This is not based on a
group scenario as the two individuals have different patient volumes.
Return to top
-
I know at one point Behavior Health/Psychiatrist were excluded from being
eligible physicians for HITECH. Is this still the case or are psychiatrists eligible
Mental health providers would only be eligible for incentive payments if they meet the
criteria of Medicaid eligible professionals (EPs). The incentive is calculated based on
Medicaid services provided by eligible providers, which were legislatively defined as
physicians, dentists, and other clinicians, but not psychologists, substance abuse counselors,
or social workers. Physicians who work in behavioral health outpatient settings may apply
for the incentives and reassign the funds to their employer, but most other behavioral
health clinicians are ineligible. However, patient encounters rendered by the behavioral
health clinicians may be counted in the patient volume.
Return to top
-
What is the first step in getting started? Is there a number I can call
for more information?
Anyone interested in applying for the incentive program will first need to register at the
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
Registration will be forwarded from CMS and Providers can then complete an application by logging
onto Interactive Services, then into MAPIR (Medical Assistance Provider Incentive Portal).
Return to top
-
I noticed on your website that EPs must verify they have paid at least ($3,750 for year 1
and $1,500 for year 2 through 6). If a Hospital or Home Office paid for the technology, is the EP
still eligible for incentive payments for EHR technology?
This no longer requires verification. CMS has assumed an average allowable cost for providers
that satisfy this requirement.
Return to top
-
Is a PA in a FQHC eligible for incentives only if the PA is the patient's primary
provider or does the PA have to be the primary provider of the FQHC?
PAs are not eligible for incentives. The Final rule says that a PA is eligible only when practicing
at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that is led by a PA and if the individual provider is
within the scope of practice defined under state law. Currently, there are no FQHC’s in Delaware
that are led by a PA as defined in the CMS Final Rule. Additionally, PAs are not within the scope
of practice defined under Delaware Medicaid Regulations. DMAP enrolls PAs for Medicare Crossover
only services to allow payments for the client’s co-insurance and/or deductible.
Return to top
-
If a patient's primary provider is a physician but the patient is occasionally seen by
a PA, would the PA qualify for incentives?
No, see answer to FAQ #11.
Return to top
-
Are PAs in physician offices, other than a FQHC qualified for incentives?
No, see answer to FAQ #11.
Return to top
-
Is there any issue with EPs applying for Medicaid incentives and being
associated with the same TIN as the hospital that will also be applying for MU incentives?
No, the TIN is only used for payment of incentives. The hospital can receive incentive payments
under this TIN and Eligible professionals can assign payments to this TIN if they choose
Return to top
-
We know that the billing provider NPI # is used to verify patient volume for EPs that choose
to use group encounters to meet eligibility requirements.
a) Does this mean the TIN has no bearing on eligibility requirements?
Correct.
b) Will EPs use the billing provider NPI # for their main satellite office if they want to apply
using group encounters or will they use the billing provider NPI#s of all 4 locations together?
Group practice may determine the volume of Medicaid and total encounters for the group and allow their
providers to use this volume. This is not dependent on the service locations as there could be one or
many locations for the group. Medicaid expects groups to be enrolled with the NPI that represents the
group and is used for billing for the individual provider’s services in that group. If a provider is
a member of multiple groups that are allowing the group volume to be used for this program, the EP
should select only one group volume to report. This is sufficient to make them eligible to participate
in the program. Meaningful use must be met at the individual level to receive an incentive. See the
CMS Frequently Asked Questions.
c) Several physicians practice at multiple locations. Will they use the billing provider NPI # of
all locations where they work to calculate group patient volume?
Group practice may determine the volume of Medicaid and total encounters for the group and allow their
providers to use this volume. This is not dependent on the service locations as there could be one or
many locations for the group. Medicaid expects groups to be enrolled with the NPI that represents the
group and is used for billing for the individual providers services in that group. If a provider is a
member of multiple groups that are allowing the group volume to be used for this program, the EP should
select only one group volume to report. This is sufficient to make them eligible to participate in the
program. Meaningful use must be met at the individual level to receive an incentive. See the
CMS Frequently Asked Questions.
d) If a provider uses group volumes is the provider required to select the group as the payee?
No, EPs can decide to assign the payment to the group or receive the payment themselves. Payment
designation is made as part of the federal registration and attestation process (R&A).
Return to top
-
If EP’s in a group have attested to program year 1 and a new EP joins the group,
can the new EP attest to AIU or will the EP be required to attest to MU?
The new EP may attest to AIU.
Return to top
-
As the non-EHR professionals adopt EHR technology (sharing the same TIN # as the EHR
early adopters), will their Medicaid patient volume percentages affect the group practice volume
percentages if the group practice qualifies as a group meeting the 30% Medicaid threshold?
The encounter volume is for all individuals within the practice and is not based on the
quantity of the individuals that seek the incentive payment. The entire encounter volume
including the non-EHR professionals Medicaid patient volume would have been originally
included in the group practice volume.
Return to top
-
One physician sees patients in a traveling van and all of his patients are considered
charity care. Will he be eligible for Medicaid incentives based on the needy individual’s definition:
patients furnished uncompensated care by the provider or services at no cost?
No, the needy individual’s definition applies to FQHC volume only.
Return to top
-
For the first participation year, an EP only has to Adopt, Implement, or Upgrade an
EHR to receive incentives. For the following years, the EP must meet certain objectives and
measures during a specified EHR reporting period. For participation year 2 and later, if a
physician practices at several locations, will all locations be taken into consideration to meet
the objectives or will only the primary practice location be utilized?
Providers who practice at multiple locations must have 50 percent of their total patient
encounters at locations where certified EHR technology is utilized to meet meaningful use requirement.
a. In order to demonstrate that at least 50% of all encounters occur in a location(s) where
certified EHR technology is being utilized, must a provider include all locations even if a
single location represents over 50% of the patient encounters?
The provider has to attest to using data from all locations with CEHRT and not just a single
location that represents over 50% of patient encounters. For example, if a provider sees patients
in 3 locations and 60% of patient encounters occur in Location A which has CEHRT, 20% of patient
encounters in Location B which has CEHRT and 20% of patient encounters in Location C which has
CEHRT, the provider must include data from Location A, Location B and Location C. They cannot
just choose Location A because it totals over 50%. The data must include both a numerator and denominator.
Return to top
-
For a FQHC, do free care encounters, charity care encounters, and sliding scale encounters
count toward meeting the 30% eligibility requirement?
Yes, this meets the CMS definition of "needy individual".
Return to top
-
How is an encounter defined for purposes of determining patient volume?
Federal rules allow the services below to be considered Medical Assistance encounters for calculating
patient volume. For Eligible Professionals: Services rendered on any one day to an individual where
Medical Assistance paid for part or all of the service or their premiums, co-payments and/or cost-sharing.
For Hospitals: Services rendered to an individual per inpatient discharges where Medical Assistance
paid for part or all of the service or their premiums, co-payments and/or cost-sharing. Services rendered
to an individual in an emergency department on any one day where Medical Assistance paid for part or all
of the service; or their premiums, co-payments and/or cost-sharing.
Return to top
-
Where can Meaningful Use standards be found?
Medical Assistance Meaningful Use requirements are posted on the CMS website:
Eligible Professionals Link
Eligible Hospitals Link
Guide to CQM's
Return to top
-
What are the requirements for Stage 1 of Meaningful Use?
For EPs, there are a total of 25 meaningful use objectives. To qualify for an incentive payment, 20 of these 25 objectives must be met.
a) There are 15 required core objectives.
b) The remaining 5 objectives may be chosen from the list of 10 menu set objectives.
For eligible hospitals and CAHs, there are a total of 24 meaningful use objectives. To qualify for an incentive
payment, 19 of these 24 objectives must be met.
a) There are 14 required core objectives.
b) The remaining 5 objectives may be chosen from the list of 10 menu set objectives.
Return to top
-
What are the different Stages of the EHR Incentive Program?
The criteria for meaningful use will be staged in three steps over the course of the next five years.
- Stage 1 sets the baseline for electronic data capture and information sharing.
- Stage 2 (beginning in 2014) Advance clinical processes.
- Stage 3 (expected to be implemented in 2016) Improved outcomes.
Return to top
-
How long does a provider need to keep documentation supporting their EHR program application?
Providers are required to retain documentation in support of all attestations for no fewer than six
years after each payment year.
Return to top
-
For MU measure reporting in MAPIR will the percentages round up?
The on-line application (MAPIR) only rounds down to the whole number. For example, if the MU Measure report
states 29.8% for a measure, MAPIR would calculate that as 29%. The rule requires that measures be met
at “more than” the specified threshold. So in this example, if the measure requires more than 30%, your
percentage must be at least 30.01 to meet the measure. MAPIR will display the percentage at 30% but will
pass the measure. If your percentage is 29.8%, MAPIR will display 29% and the measure will fail.
Return to top
-
If an eligible professional (EP) sees a patient in a setting that does not have certified
electronic health record (EHR) technology but enters all of the patient's information into certified
EHR technology at another practice location, can the patient be counted in the numerators and
denominators of meaningful use measures for the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs?
Starting in 2013, an EP must have access to Certified EHR Technology at a location in order to include
patients seen in locations in the determination of eligibility and to count towards meaningful use. EPs
will not be able to include patients seen at locations where they do not have access to Certified EHR
Technology. Access to Certified EHR technology can be in any manner such as the location hosting
Certified EHR Technology, the EP bringing their Certified EHR Technology to the location on a portable
device, or the EP having access to their Certified EHR Technology remotely at the location using
devices available at the location.
Return to top
-
For eligible professionals (EPs) who see patients in both inpatient and outpatient
settings (e.g., hospital and clinic), and where certified electronic health record (EHR) technology
is available at each location, should these EPs base their denominators for meaningful use
objectives on the number of unique patients in only the outpatient setting or on the total number
of unique patients from both settings?
In this case, EPs should base both the numerators and denominators for meaningful use objectives
on the number of unique patients in the outpatient setting, since this setting is where they are
eligible to receive payments from the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive.
Return to top
-
How should eligible professionals (EPs) select menu objectives for the Medicare and
Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Programs?
EPs participating in Stage 1 of the EHR Incentive Programs are required to report on a total
of 5 meaningful use objectives from the menu set of 10. When selecting five objectives from the
menu set, EPs must choose at least one option from the public health menu set. If an EP is able
to meet the measure of one of the public health menu objectives but can be excluded from the other,
the EP should select and report on the public health menu objective they are able to meet. If an
EP can be excluded from both public health menu objectives, the EP should claim an exclusion from
only one public health objective and report on four additional menu objectives from outside the
public health menu set.
EPs participating in Stage 2 are required to report 3 meaningful use objectives from the menu set of 6.
We encourage EPs to select menu objectives that are relevant to their scope of practice, and claim
exclusion for a menu objective only in cases where there are no remaining menu objectives for which
they qualify or if there are no remaining menu objectives that are relevant to their scope of practice.
For example, we expect that EPs will report on 5 measures, if there are 5 measures that are relevant
to their scope of practice and for which they can report data, even if they qualify for exclusions in
the other objectives. Please note that EPs must have complete certified EHR technology (or a complete
set of certified EHR modules) capable of supporting all of the core and menu set objectives, including
any objectives for which the EP can claim an exclusion and menu set objectives the EP does not select.
Starting in 2014 for both Stage 1 and Stage 2, meeting the exclusion criteria will no longer count
as reporting a meaningful use objective from the menu set. An EP must meet the measure criteria for 5
objectives in Stage 1 (3 objectives in Stage 2) or report on all of the menu set objectives through a
combination of meeting exclusion and meeting the measure.
Return to top
-
If I am participating in the Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program
but also provide care to Medicare patients, am I subject to the Medicare payment adjustments?
Yes. While there are no payment adjustments under the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program, those Medicaid EPs who
are also paid under Medicare could be subject to payment adjustments if they are not meaningful EHR users for
an applicable reporting period. Adopting, implementing and upgrading EHR technology is not considered
meaningful use for these purposes.
Return to top
|
If you need assistance selecting and using an EHR system,
contact the Delaware Regional Extension Center
If you would like more information on the DMAP Provider Incentive Program
for Electronic Health Records please direct your inquiries to
Delaware Provider Incentive Payment Team
|